Order to Evict in Winter
Is Legal and Possible Despite the Common Contrary Urban Myth
Page last modified: January 05 2022
Is It Legal to Evict a Tenant During Winter Months?
The Law Does Allow For An Eviction During the Winter; However, the Landlord Tenant Board Holds Discretionary Power and May Decide Against Issuing An Eviction In the Winter.
The misconception that residential tenants cannot be evicted in winter is likely rooted in a misinterpretation of what may be the case.
The text does not explicitly state what occurs and what indeed takes place. There is no specific mention within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, Chapter 17.
The belief stems from a misinterpretation regarding the law in Ontario governing residential tenancies, suggesting a prohibition on evictions during winter. However, the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, includes section 83, granting the Landlord Tenant Board’s adjudicator discretionary powers to decide cases. Precisely, section 83 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 states:
(a) refuse to grant the application unless satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that it would be unfair to refuse; or
(b) order that the enforcement of the eviction order be postponed for a period of time.
(2) If a hearing is held, the Board shall not grant the application unless it has reviewed the circumstances and considered whether or not it should exercise its powers under subsection (1). (3) Without restricting the generality of subsection (1), the Board shall refuse to grant the application where satisfied that,
(a) the landlord is in serious breach of the landlord’s responsibilities under this Act or of any material covenant in the tenancy agreement;
(b) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant has complained to a governmental authority of the landlord’s violation of a law dealing with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards;
(c) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant has attempted to secure or enforce his or her legal rights;
(d) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant is a member of a tenants’ association or is attempting to organize such an association; or
(e) the reason for the application being brought is that the rental unit is occupied by children and the occupation by the children does not constitute overcrowding.
(4) The Board shall not issue an eviction order in a proceeding regarding termination of a tenancy for the purposes of residential occupation, demolition, conversion to non-residential rental use, renovations or repairs until the landlord has complied with section 48.1, 49.1, 52, 54 or 55, as the case may be.
(5) If a tenant has given a landlord notice under subsection 53 (2) and subsection 54 (2) or (4) applies, the Board shall not issue an eviction order in a proceeding regarding termination of the tenancy until the landlord has compensated the tenant in accordance with subsection 54 (2) or (4), as applicable.
(6) Without restricting the generality of subsections (1) and (2), if a hearing is held in respect of an application under section 69 for an order evicting a tenant based on arrears of rent arising in whole or in part during the period beginning on March 17, 2020 and ending on the prescribed date, in determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1) the Board shall consider whether the landlord has attempted to negotiate an agreement with the tenant including terms of payment for the tenant’s arrears.
(7) Subsection (6) applies with respect to any application described in that subsection that,
(a) is made on or after the day subsection 17 (3) of Schedule 4 to the Protecting Tenants and Strengthening Community Housing Act, 2020 comes into force; or
(b) was made before that day and was not finally determined before that day.
(8) For greater certainty, subsection (6) applies whether or not a date has been prescribed for the purposes of that subsection.
Hence, the Landlord Tenant Board adjudicator has the discretion to abstain from mandating an eviction during winter, potentially by issuing an Order to Evict with a postponed eviction date. Nevertheless, it is incorrect to assume that a wintertime eviction is illegal, impractical, or improbable solely because the Landlord Tenant Board adjudicator might refrain from ordering one. Depending on the circumstances, a wintertime eviction can indeed take place.
Summary Comment
The notion that evictions are illegal in the winter is inaccurate and stems from an urban myth. This myth appears to arise from the perception that, because the Landlord Tenant Board may opt to avoid evictions in the winter, it is misconstrued that the Board is incapable of issuing an eviction order during this season.
(a) refuse to grant the application unless satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances, that it would be unfair to refuse; or
(b) order that the enforcement of the eviction order be postponed for a period of time.
(2) If a hearing is held, the Board shall not grant the application unless it has reviewed the circumstances and considered whether or not it should exercise its powers under subsection (1). (3) Without restricting the generality of subsection (1), the Board shall refuse to grant the application where satisfied that,
(a) the landlord is in serious breach of the landlord’s responsibilities under this Act or of any material covenant in the tenancy agreement;
(b) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant has complained to a governmental authority of the landlord’s violation of a law dealing with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards;
(c) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant has attempted to secure or enforce his or her legal rights;
(d) the reason for the application being brought is that the tenant is a member of a tenants’ association or is attempting to organize such an association; or
(e) the reason for the application being brought is that the rental unit is occupied by children and the occupation by the children does not constitute overcrowding.
(4) The Board shall not issue an eviction order in a proceeding regarding termination of a tenancy for the purposes of residential occupation, demolition, conversion to non-residential rental use, renovations or repairs until the landlord has complied with section 48.1, 49.1, 52, 54 or 55, as the case may be.
(5) If a tenant has given a landlord notice under subsection 53 (2) and subsection 54 (2) or (4) applies, the Board shall not issue an eviction order in a proceeding regarding termination of the tenancy until the landlord has compensated the tenant in accordance with subsection 54 (2) or (4), as applicable.
(6) Without restricting the generality of subsections (1) and (2), if a hearing is held in respect of an application under section 69 for an order evicting a tenant based on arrears of rent arising in whole or in part during the period beginning on March 17, 2020 and ending on the prescribed date, in determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1) the Board shall consider whether the landlord has attempted to negotiate an agreement with the tenant including terms of payment for the tenant’s arrears.
(7) Subsection (6) applies with respect to any application described in that subsection that,
(a) is made on or after the day subsection 17 (3) of Schedule 4 to the Protecting Tenants and Strengthening Community Housing Act, 2020 comes into force; or
(b) was made before that day and was not finally determined before that day.
(8) For greater certainty, subsection (6) applies whether or not a date has been prescribed for the purposes of that subsection.
Learn About :
Shemesh Legal Offices serves clients located in Hamilton, Grimsby, Brantford,
Ancaster, Caledonia, among other places.
ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this web form. Use this web form only to make an introduction.